Judge Confirms Superior Court Under Admiralty Jurisdiction
Many people lately have begun to notice the differences in flags that are being flown on government properties and within the buildings.
Rest assured, this post is not about the flags representing communism and sexual perversion that have, in recent years, defiled the State Department and the capitols of states such as California, New York, and Wisconsin. Rather, this post will briefly expose a little known fact about the fringed flag that is displayed inside government buildings and court rooms.
In the late ‘90’s, I was challenging the procedings in an administrative tribunal known as Traffic Court when I met a likeminded military gentleman who told me that the yellow fringe around the flag in the court room represented Admiralty jurisdiction. This sounded like crazy conspiracy theory, so I asked him to provide proof. Surprisingly, he later delivered to me a cassette tape containing the recording of a Superior Court judge’s response when he challenged him about the jurisdiction established by the fringed flag. That recording can be heard here.
Being a serviceman, the gentleman who captured the recording had a very good understanding of the significance of the styles of flags and the claim made by raising a flag at a site. Perhaps, if you are an American over 60 years of age, you remember learning the meaning of the flag raising at Iwo Jima at the end of WWII.
The Law of the Flag governs the jurisdiction of a forum. According to 2 Am Jur 2d, §132, pg 755:
“The law of the flag, not the law of the forum, is generally applied to matters of substantive law…It supersedes the territorial principle (lex loci delicti or “law of the place”), even for the purposes of criminal jurisdiction…and will be enforced by an American admiralty court.”
To America’s detriment, the Law of the Flag is unknown to most citizens- including active military whose Woke training has supplanted knowledge of vital historical principles for maintaining liberty. As a result, those who are hailed into administrative tribunals as defendants are unaware that Admiralty is likely the jurisdiction being applied, so they remain baffled and bulldozed by a system that is not necessarily meant to deliver justice.
Would you like to learn more? You are welcomed to sign-up for a training course here. All of the courses cover Admiralty jurisdiction.
Sorry, but this is very misleading and will cause problems for anyone trying to make use of it!! I know because I bought into it years ago and challenged it in various courts.
Then I did my due diligence and looked it up. Guess what?
1. It the military manual it states that the "fringe" is for special events and for dignitaries... that's all... It DOES NOT CHANGE "JURISDICTION"!!1
2. If you know anything about "Admiralty Jurisdiction" it is far more strict than civil or criminal courts of the United States when it comes to offenses, due process etc. Example: In civil and criminal courts one "enjoys the right to compel witnesses in his favor" but in so called "Admiralty" anyone having any knowledge concerning the case MUST present it to the court. There is no choice.
3. Admiralty courts use the UCMJ which is subject to the Constitution and its provisions and protections and ALL courts no matter what venue they may be are subject to the founding trust document "The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America" in which it is clear as to its Mission statement and purpose for "any Form of Government"
"That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among men,.." Clearly not over men!!
4. Anyone who knows the "four corners rule" knows that whenever all four sides and corners are bound then the document or thing within is just that, within the bounds of that which is "Bonded" and subject to the authority thereof.... So tell me How many sides is the "fringe" on? ?? ONLY 3, thus is is not "bound" by the fringe or the alleged "Admiralty jurisdiction"
So why all the hoopla??
1. Controlled opposition.. Look it up its basically distraction so you will not see what is really going on and address it and fail to Object which constitutes consent.
2. People must be at fault because the people in positions of public trust (Government) are always honorable and always abide by the law and would never mislead, lie or cheat..... BS!!!
a. The people in positions of public trust (government... get used to using the proper terms to describe things instead of the criminal, evil Cabbala con-artists, attorneys (members of an unlawful nowhere in the Constitution, monopoly that has taken over our entire government and engaged in treason) who replace with terms which are defined other than the appearance of the "term" (different from a word) in order to purposely mislead and cause harm), are without Knowledge, Understanding or Accurate Use of the "principles" and purpose for which "Government" (meant to be governed, "by the consent of the governed") was instituted by the people in the first place:
"That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted" and "organizing its powers in such form as to them (the people) shall seem MOST likely to EFFECT their Safety and Happiness." (emphasis added).
In fact it goes on and clarifies. "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends ("to secure these Rights" and "effect their Safety and Happiness") it is the right of the people to alter or ABOLISH it..". Clearly only the creators of a thing have the power or "right" to ABOLISH it.!!!
b. The people have been dumbed down and lazy and failed to pass on the "principles" this "Republic" is founded upon, and those in positions of public trust are "bound thereby" and as such are easily mislead by impostors of law At-turn-knees (at law not in law, turning it upside-down to bring the people to their knees)
c. The people appear to be happier being victims and slaves and complaining about it, rather than doing something about it ("alter or abolish it") and hold their agents accountable... or being accountable themselves.
d. It seems that people can't get their heads wrapped around the fact that people in positions of public trust (notice how people always say "positions of power", "powerful positions", "powers that be", which projects that they are gods and kings and authority when in fact they are "servants" and "subject" to the laws, codes, Statutes, Constitutions and "principles" and Purpose for which the position they presume to hold was created and exists, "shall be bound thereby", "shall swear an oath or affirmation to support this Constitution,.") can simply be ignorant, criminal minded, there for selfish interests (embezzlement of the position), corrupt, corrupted or corruptible.
Once people change these perceptions the solution becomes obvious... "alter" it in such a manner so that those in positions of public trust are tested to insure they are in fact Competent to serve. Which means they Know the "principles" and the purpose for which Government was created and is maintained by the people, the actual Founding Trust Document from which "any Form of Government” is derived from and subject to, The Constitution for the united States of America, The Constitution of the United States (corporate entity, charter.. what it is subject to and those in any position thereof are bound by), the Statutes, Codes, Policies and State Constitutions (charters), Statutes and Codes and DESIRE to "support" them with all due diligence and Periodically tested to insure they are not corrupted and re-calibrate their perspective which gets altered by all sorts of evil attacks and to insure they are not Compromised, all this criminal crap goes away and is replaced by the best most amazing Republic ever imagined.
I'm available for calls, video calls etc when you are ready for more truth and the simple effective solution or "The Cure for Corruption"... for now check out "What's What and Why" videos on Rumble.com
Blessings.... I took the time too write this please take the time to read it and study it, write questions and follow up, verify, validate, authenticate and authorize....